Dating a dinosaur bone Sex chatten via skype

If dinosaur bones are 65 million years old, there should not be one atom of C-14 left in them.Dinosaurs are not dated with Carbon-14, yet some researchers have claimed that there is still Carbon-14 in the bones. Do these data indicate that a more accurate method needs to be derived?Furthermore, it appears less than certain that the carbon found in the bones actually had anything to do with them being dinosaur bones.In the article by Leppert, we find: Hugh Miller generously provided me with a copy of the elemental analysis of one of their dinosaur fossils.

Visit Stack Exchange The preferred method of dating dinosaur fossils is with the radiometric dating method.We proceed with the examination of the research done by Miller and his fellow researchers from the CRSEF.At a horizon of 40,000 years the amount of carbon 14 in a bone or a piece of charcoal can be truly minute: such a specimen may contain only a few thousand 14C atoms.Now, it is known that $^\text$ decays at a fast enough rate (half-life ~6000 years) for this dating method to be absolutely useless on such samples. would not have been able to obtain this sample, had they been honest about their intent.This, of course, raises some ethical questions, but let's brush these aside for now.